From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Nov 9 22:14:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from lcmail2.lc.ca.gov (lcmail2.lc.ca.gov [165.107.12.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8676337B479 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2000 22:14:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON by lcmail2.lc.ca.gov (PMDF V5.2-27 #40821) id <0G3S00D01PBDFV@lcmail2.lc.ca.gov> for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 9 Nov 2000 22:14:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from tagalong ([165.107.42.185]) by lcmail2.lc.ca.gov (PMDF V5.2-27 #40821) with SMTP id <0G3S00C92PBCYZ@lcmail2.lc.ca.gov> for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 09 Nov 2000 22:14:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2000 22:14:17 -0800 From: Drew Tomlinson Subject: RE: Network Card Troubleshooting (was How To Configure 2nd NIC?) In-reply-to: To: 'Josh Paetzel' , 'Drew Tomlinson' , "'FreeBSD Questions (E-mail)'" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-priority: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > -----Original Message----- > From: Josh Paetzel [mailto:jpaetzel@hutchtel.net] > Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 8:51 PM > To: Drew Tomlinson; 'FreeBSD Questions (E-mail)' > Subject: Re: Network Card Troubleshooting (was How To Configure 2nd > NIC?) > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Drew Tomlinson" > To: "'Josh Paetzel'" ; "'FreeBSD > Questions (E-mail)'" > > Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 10:04 PM > Subject: RE: Network Card Troubleshooting (was How To > Configure 2nd NIC?) > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Josh Paetzel [mailto:jpaetzel@hutchtel.net] > > > Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 7:23 PM > > > To: Drew Tomlinson; FreeBSD Questions (E-mail) > > > Subject: Re: Network Card Troubleshooting (was How To > Configure 2nd > > > NIC?) > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Drew Tomlinson" > > > To: "FreeBSD Questions (E-mail)" > > > Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 6:48 PM > > > Subject: Network Card Troubleshooting (was How To > Configure 2nd NIC?) > > > > > > > > > > I installed a 2nd NIC, added an entry for it in my kernel > > > config file, > > > > recompiled, and added appropriate entries (AFAIK) in > rc.conf. Upon > > > reboot, > > > > FBSD detects both cards and sets them up but only the > > > original responds to > > > > ping. I get the following messages at restart: > > > > > > > > [snip] > > > > ed0 at port 0x240-0x25f iomem 0xd8000 irq 9 drq 0 on isa0 > > > > ed0: address 00:40:05:66:b2:55, type NE2000 (16 bit) > > > > ed1 at port 0x260-0x27f iomem 0xd8000 irq 11 on isa0 > > > > ed1: address 00:40:05:66:b2:52, type NE2000 (16 bit) > > > > > > > Your problem is here....both the cards are using the same > > > iomem address. > > > You need to change one of them so they do not have this conflict. > > > > OK, thanks. Do I just pick a number or is there something > that you would > > suggest? What are my choices? And for future reference, > where would I > look > > for this information? > > > > Thanks again! > > > > You should have some sort of set up utility on the driver > disks for the > card...that will give you the range of choices that you have. > There isn't > really a method for choosing them, just use the next one on > the list and see > what happens. I don't know exactly what kind of card you > have, but if it is > older it might have jumpers on the card to set the iomem > addressing instead I do have a utility but there is no choice for setting anything like iomem. I picked different settings for what they call I/O base address which corresponds to the 0x240 line on ed0 and the 0x260 line on ed1. I can also set the IRQs which I did; ed0=9 & ed1=11. There are no conflicts AFAIK as self-testing shows both cards working OK. Do you have any other ideas? The cards are LinkSys Ether16 LAN cards if that helps. > of a software utility. Plug and Play has kind of removed us > from the joys > of configuring hardware, but most cards require one or more > irqs, a range of Yeah, I haven't done this for a long time. Brings back memories. I know I keep saying it but thank you again for your time on this. I really appreciate it and am anxious to take on the task of setting up NAT and filters. Now if I could just get both interfaces working... :) Drew > port addresses, and a range of iomem addresses...anytime you > are installing > two of the exact same card you can run into these issues, but > different > cards can also conflict with each other as well.....back in > about 1982 I > remember I has a frobozz fribulator that could use only irq > 4, and that's > the same irq that my time/date card just had to use as > well....neither one > of them could be changed, so one of them had to go. As I > like to say, I can > handle not knowing the time or date, but if my computer can't > fribulate, > what's the point of life? > > Josh > > > Drew > > > > > Josh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message