From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 21 08:02:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2496C16A4CE for ; Fri, 21 May 2004 08:02:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp05.web.de (smtp05.web.de [217.72.192.209]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E438743D46 for ; Fri, 21 May 2004 08:02:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from platanthera@web.de) Received: from [217.225.243.123] (helo=liza.hacienda.herti) by smtp05.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (WEB.DE 4.101 #91) id 1BRBXo-0005YX-00 for freebsd-doc@freebsd.org; Fri, 21 May 2004 17:02:45 +0200 From: platanthera To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 17:02:23 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <40AD7FCA.2050407@potentialtech.com> <20040521001709.051a74cf@localhost> <40ADFC1C.30601@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <40ADFC1C.30601@potentialtech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200405211702.38412.platanthera@web.de> Sender: platanthera@web.de Subject: Re: Potential update to the cron section of the handbook X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 15:02:47 -0000 On Friday 21 May 2004 14:54, Bill Moran wrote: > Tom Rhodes wrote: > > On Fri, 21 May 2004 00:04:26 -0400 > > > > Bill Moran wrote: > >>This change was provoked by the following thread: > >>http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040520205749.4392.qmail > >> > >>I've tried to add enough warnings and other information to make > >>the difference clear without going overboard. > >> > >>See rendered version here: > >>http://www.potentialtech.com/wmoran/configtuning-cron.html > >> > >>If it looks good, I'll make a diff and file a PR. Any > >>suggestions, complains, etc? > > > > Wow, you're up late Mr. Bill. :P > > Yeah, it happens sometimes. > > > There is already a PR about this although I don't like the patch; > > tomorrow I'll review yours and get back with you. > > Hmmm ... I guess I was lazy and forgot to check the PR database > first. One thing I do like about the other PR is the link to the > FAQ entry. Perhaps I should retool a bit to include that. hi Bill, in fact, I've been much lazier than you. Just saw that everything is well explained in the FAQ and therefore only added a short note. But your version is much more instructive and that's why it should be preferred. Please include the link. best regards