From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 2 16:00:27 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4520C5AC; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 16:00:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [198.74.231.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02EC69D5; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 16:00:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [198.74.231.63]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23CE246B5C; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 12:00:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 17:00:26 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Mateusz Guzik Subject: Re: svn commit: r280971 - in head: contrib/ipfilter/tools share/man/man4 sys/contrib/ipfilter/netinet sys/netinet sys/netipsec sys/netpfil/pf In-Reply-To: <20150402153805.GD549@dft-labs.eu> Message-ID: References: <201504012226.t31MQedN044443@svn.freebsd.org> <1427929676.82583.103.camel@freebsd.org> <20150402123522.GC64665@FreeBSD.org> <20150402133751.GA549@dft-labs.eu> <20150402134217.GG64665@FreeBSD.org> <20150402135157.GB549@dft-labs.eu> <1427983109.82583.115.camel@freebsd.org> <20150402142318.GC549@dft-labs.eu> <20150402143420.GI64665@FreeBSD.org> <20150402153805.GD549@dft-labs.eu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Gleb Smirnoff , src-committers@freebsd.org, Ian Lepore X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 16:00:27 -0000 On Thu, 2 Apr 2015, Mateusz Guzik wrote: >> If you carefully read the thread I referred to, you would notice that on >> many arches, save amd64 and i386, all systems stats are prone to mangling >> the stats due to migration within PCPU_INC. Look here: >> >> grep '^#define PCPU_ADD' sys/*/include/pcpu.h >> >> Do we have reports on not precise enough statistics, yet? > > How many non-x86 installations with multiple cpus and high traffic are out > there? Not sure if this was a rhetorical question or not, but: quite a few. We have support for several highly threaded 64-bit MIPS systems including those from Cavium and Broadcom (was NetLogic Micro was RMI). Several reference systems are in the netperf cluster including 16- and 32-thread systems normally deployed in high-performance network products. It's possible that ARMv8 systems will gradually displayce 64-bit MIPS systems in this arena in the future, but hard to say. Either way, it's not x86. :-) Robert