Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 17:51:15 -0500 From: Peter Schwenk <peterschwenk@home.com> To: cjclark@home.com Cc: Sam Carleton <scarleton@miltonstreet.com>, FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: ipfw is not working Message-ID: <38CACDE3.41C25EC6@home.com> References: <38C9D32F.E8F2254A@miltonstreet.com> <20000311123542.B23514@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> <38CA9F0F.8A8F89F5@miltonstreet.com> <20000311172441.B24340@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I guess I'll chime in... "IP Masquerading" is a Linux-ism for NAT. If you only used Linux, you would never know the term NAT. "Crist J. Clark" wrote: > > No. NAT only needs one registered IP address on the external > interface. If it required a one-to-one mapping, it'd be rather > useless. See the natd(8) manpage. Also see RFC 1631 and other RFCs > related to NAT if interested. (BTW, there are no RFCs about "IP > masquerading." No idea if there are differences.) -- - Peter Schwenk - peterschwenk@home.com - - Give FreeBSD a try! http://www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?38CACDE3.41C25EC6>