From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Nov 22 14:31:37 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 544A616A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:31:37 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from avout3.midco.net (avout3.midco.net [24.220.0.102])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C626543D54
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:31:36 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from pmes@bis.midco.net)
Received: (qmail 23350 invoked by uid 1009); 22 Nov 2004 14:31:36 -0000
Received: from pmes@bis.midco.net by avout3 by uid 1003 with
	qmail-scanner-1.22 
	(f-prot: 4.4.2/3.14.11.  Clear:RC:1(24.220.219.219):. 
	Processed in 0.011838 secs); 22 Nov 2004 14:31:36 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: pmes@bis.midco.net via avout3
X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.22 (Clear:RC:1(24.220.219.219):. Processed in 0.011838
	secs)
Received: from host-219-219-220-24.midco.net (HELO [24.220.219.219])
	([24.220.219.219])          (envelope-sender <pmes@bis.midco.net>)
	by avout3.midco.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
	for <current@freebsd.org>; 22 Nov 2004 14:31:36 -0000
In-Reply-To: <20041122141552.GC960@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>
References: <20041120000743.G18094@mail.chesapeake.net>
	<41A1C3BD.4010903@fer.hr> <20041122064318.Y18094@mail.chesapeake.net>
	<20041122141552.GC960@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <3457D9D4-3C93-11D9-BAB4-000D936BE398@bis.midco.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Peter Schultz <pmes@bis.midco.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 08:31:32 -0600
To: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619)
cc: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Giantless VFS.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:31:37 -0000

On Nov 22, 2004, at 8:15 AM, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:

>> I haven't received any feedback from the list though.  I hope people 
>> are
>> testing it.  Perhaps the silence indicates universal success? :-)
>
> Would it be interesting to try your patch on a UP system ?  To
> anticipate an hypotetical affirmative answer, I'm already recompiling 
> my
> UP kernel with it.
>
>
Reducing contention over the kernel is beneficial for any number of 
processors.

Pete...