From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri May 18 18:39:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from hall.mail.mindspring.net (hall.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.60]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 502A137B422 for ; Fri, 18 May 2001 18:39:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from vsilyaev@mindspring.com) Received: from delta.rc.ny.us (nyf-ny2-30.ix.netcom.com [198.211.16.94]) by hall.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA15285; Fri, 18 May 2001 21:39:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from vsilyaev@localhost) by delta.rc.ny.us (8.11.1/8.9.3) id f4J1des00346; Fri, 18 May 2001 21:39:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from vsilyaev) Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 21:39:40 -0400 From: Vladimir Silyaev To: dochawk@psu.edu Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: looking for vmware fm's Message-ID: <20010518213940.A329@delta.rc.ny.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Yeah, vmware suppose to be slower that original computer - especially it much slower that a lot of I/O and/or interrupts/exceptions occured. You may try to mount live UFS, but as R/O, it should be safe enough, and most likely than to mount nfs'ed drive. -- Vladimir To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message