Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:38:03 +0300 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: CFT: Adobe Reader 8 + SCIM/UIM Message-ID: <65008900@bb.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <20080115.045405.84737523.hrs@allbsd.org> (Hiroki Sato's message of "Tue\, 15 Jan 2008 04\:54\:05 %2B0900 \(JST\)") References: <20080108095126.2efc4557@anthesphoria.net> <20080114.023713.237718911.hrs@allbsd.org> <20080114180414.28009108@anthesphoria.net> <20080115.045405.84737523.hrs@allbsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:54:05 +0900 (JST) Hiroki Sato wrote: > Hmm, these two cases are different from me. Let me investigate this > further... This problem is due to interaction between FreeBSD's gtk > library and Linux's, so I am guessing there is consistency in some > degree and want to figure out it. May be it's not the case but I once have got through a specific linuxulator behaviour. I've been porting a propriate linux application which was built for 2.4 kernel. The application used a FreeBSD library instead of a linux one and exited with (something like) "OS ABI invalid". The needed linux library was installed but not used... When I examined ktrace/kdump, I noticed that the linux library really was probed but apparently something prevented it from being used and then a FreeBSD native library was chosen... All my test configuration has defaults. But when I set compat.linux.osrelease to 2.6.16 (even with linux_base-fc4) the application was launched and functionning. Well, the long story in short. Even if an application is compiled for 2.4 kernel it may want to use a more recent 2.4 features that we don't have by default right now. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?65008900>