Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 31 Oct 2024 18:43:15 +0000
From:      "Patrick M. Hausen" <hausen@punkt.de>
To:        Girgensohn Palle <girgen@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: pf for netgraph jails?
Message-ID:  <E7A4BB86-87DB-42D3-900D-C74BE8F27D90@punkt.de>
In-Reply-To: <B3F69BC8-9750-484A-985C-583AB9FC4357@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <7D5BD9CC-8A08-4C74-B2E6-E0437235F3B1@FreeBSD.org> <16E8EF1D-9CB0-4158-B0A4-FB4F91A03D2C@punkt.de> <B3F69BC8-9750-484A-985C-583AB9FC4357@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Palle,

> Am 31.10.2024 um 16:32 schrieb Palle Girgensohn <girgen@freebsd.org>:
> Thanks for the reply. It seems that these MIBs are related to if_bridge, =
not ng_bridge? I didn't have them at first, men after kldload if_bridge the=
y appeared. They make no difference, though, so perhaps they do not relate =
to netgraph bridges?
>=20
> Any idea what tuneables would do the job?

Nope, that was just a guess, because I know that these tunables are necessa=
ry for if_bridge and nobody else answered.

I never used netgraph.


Kind regards,
Patrick=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E7A4BB86-87DB-42D3-900D-C74BE8F27D90>