From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Oct 12 16:39:43 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: performance@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 535DF16A412
	for <performance@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:39:43 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from hakmi@rogers.com)
Received: from smtp105.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp105.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com
	[206.190.36.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CBC0A43E07
	for <performance@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:39:07 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from hakmi@rogers.com)
Received: (qmail 50214 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2006 16:38:34 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com;
	h=Received:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:Thread-Index:In-Reply-To;
	b=MWirUE7aHelEUk9uoCa9wNZncsRqRPGkkHCGUBg3PuchsARL+furPvmTkikZKW3aMLi6BH5Fj7aCycqY3Pkk6GwtBBhJB7yqEUBZQGdB4+yiV4wnsdrMhPMMe6M1orj0LUEIeokgATql/BVdJTL//h70539G0qNL+FKUuuc3qtg=
	; 
Received: from unknown (HELO tamouh) (hakmi@rogers.com@70.27.160.99 with login)
	by smtp105.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Oct 2006 16:38:33 -0000
From: "Tamouh H." <hakmi@rogers.com>
To: "'Eric Anderson'" <anderson@centtech.com>,
	<danial_thom@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 12:38:36 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
Thread-Index: AcbuFdTifsBR06JsTiCoMpbCN5VZagAAMjUA
In-Reply-To: <452E6054.8000604@centtech.com>
Message-Id: <20061012163907.CBC0A43E07@mx1.FreeBSD.org>
Cc: performance@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x
X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance/tuning <freebsd-performance.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:39:43 -0000

=20
>=20
> Anyway, people should stop complaining, and start offering up=20
> hardware, net connections, and man power to support a cvs=20
> repo/packages/etc for the 4.x tree if they want it.  That's=20
> what people do, and that's the beauty of open source.
>=20
>=20
> Eric
>=20

I agree, however, there appears to be no strategy or procedure for =
FreeBSD testing. This has been asked on this group before. Are there any =
standardized set number of tools we can deploy on FreeBSD to examine and =
test for performance, bugs and compatibility ?

Then we can use the reports from these tools to forward them to the =
developers for further examination.

Tamouh