From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 18 13:53:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA03106564A for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:53:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.smith@ukgrid.net) Received: from mx0.ukgrid.net (mx0.ukgrid.net [89.21.28.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 132C28FC14 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:53:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [89.21.28.38] (port=15104 helo=omicron.ukgrid.net) by mx0.ukgrid.net with esmtp (Exim 4.74; FreeBSD) envelope-from a.smith@ukgrid.net id 1Q0a72-0005wZ-EU; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:53:08 +0000 Received: from voip.ukgrid.net (voip.ukgrid.net [89.107.16.9]) by webmail2.ukgrid.net (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:53:08 +0000 Message-ID: <20110318135308.17082qlymxou8des@webmail2.ukgrid.net> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:53:08 +0000 From: a.smith@ukgrid.net To: Thomas Johnson References: <20110318122311.13302c8sfl73pzfo@webmail2.ukgrid.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3.9) / FreeBSD-8.1 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HAST + ZFS causes system to shutdown uncleanly? X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:53:10 -0000 Quoting Thomas Johnson : > The idea is not to replicate data from production to testing, I probably > didn't explain that very well. In our production network, we have a pair of > NFS servers attached to a Dell MD3000 disk cabinet. Since I can't directly > recreate that setup in ESXi, HAST seems like a good alternative, since it > gives me failover access to the same data on my virtualized NFS heads. > Ah ok, well depending on your requirement ZFS send/receive might still work with a bit of scripting, but HAST in theory should be simpler to setup I guess. Anohter option would be a third ESX virtual host running an iSCSI target to provide shared storage to the two test NFS servers... ta Andy.