From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 22 17:12:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFEA716A403 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:12:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41C043E28 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:08:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679731A3C1E; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:09:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B110C5126C; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:09:13 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 12:09:13 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Lapo Luchini Message-ID: <20061122170913.GA38255@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <854C78DB-2099-4DA5-9E3B-F30D6947C532@jlauser.net> <4512F957.2090205@centtech.com> <20060922041535.GF4842@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <455890AE.9050807@centtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Snapshot corruption on 6.1/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:12:13 -0000 --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 01:01:03PM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote: > Eric Anderson wrote: > >> Panic String: snapacct_ufs2: bad block > >> I have the dump file, for the latest problem. > > Maybe you have a bad disk? You might try swapping the drive out. (just > > a wild guess here) >=20 > Does "snapacct_ufs2: bad block" really mean "bad" as in "unreadable"? > RTFS I tought it was just a "logic" inconsistency. >=20 > Anyway, after having de-activated all snapshots for weeks (and deleted > all the old ones) I got this panic again. >=20 > I'm currently doing a "dd if=3D/dev/ad0 of=3D/dev/null bs=3D1m" as sugges= ted > by dd(1) in order to be sure it is not an hardwareissue. >=20 > And if all is well I will "dd if=3D/dev/ad0 of=3D/dev/ad0 bs=3D1m" too. >=20 > And then recompile with latest -STABLE just to be sure to have the > latest amd64-based snapshot fixes. >=20 > Hope this is the last time I see that panic... -_- I've lost context, how are you reproducing the panic? Kris --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFZIQ5Wry0BWjoQKURAuzPAKDb5arS5uVct5eHUfMgp8mbsgScfwCeOM9I 1sew/C9nM3fzUZ07EYQ6lkM= =n0F5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND--