From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 19 06:52:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9078416A4CE; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 06:52:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E37943D1F; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 06:52:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 378E95309; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:52:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 8B2305308; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:52:49 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 19DB233C6F; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:52:49 +0100 (CET) To: Maxim Sobolev References: <200402191122.i1JBMdHd026435@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040219135233.GK35012@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> <4034C24E.60709@portaone.com> <4034C919.4090401@portaone.com> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:52:49 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4034C919.4090401@portaone.com> (Maxim Sobolev's message of "Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:32:57 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.63 cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/asterisk Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:52:58 -0000 Maxim Sobolev writes: > Who tells that? Is that voice of God or maybe Satoshi Asami has returned? I could ask you the same question. > Des, please don't speak up when you don't know what you are talking > about Instead you have to fix your own attitute, thich nowadays is > about sticking your nose into the areas in which you don't have even > sligtest expertise. Is this how you handle adversity? Anyone who disagrees with you is an interfering ignorant jerk, no matter how many years they have spent groping through the insides of whatever it is you are arguing about? > The real problem is that ${.CURDIR} in make(1) evaluates not to > current working directory but to realpath(3)-like "real" path. There is no way around that. It is the nature of Unix. The current working directory is not a path name like in DOS or Windows, but a vnode reference. Feel free to take a closer look at how pwd(1) and getcwd(2) are implemented if you don't believe me. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no