From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Dec 11 10:42:42 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF64EE8D5B1 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:42:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e.0x20.net) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [46.251.251.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "0x20.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7775B7E00A for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:42:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e.0x20.net) Received: from e.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [46.251.251.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4299FA2ABC; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:42:31 +0100 (CET) Received: (from lars@localhost) by e.0x20.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id vBBAgUlv030848; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:42:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lars) Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:42:30 +0100 From: Lars Engels To: Dave Horsfall Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check Message-ID: <20171211104230.GV19238@e.0x20.net> References: <20171208180905.GA96560@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20171209012522.GA42506@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20171210171122.GA48536@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 8.0 User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:42:42 -0000 On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 09:09:39AM +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote: > On Sun, 10 Dec 2017, Adam Weinberger wrote: > > > DMA is a phenomenal program and is totally sufficient for a large > > percentage of our user-base. I wasn’t aware of the lack of .forward > > support, and I completely agree that that’s a very detrimental omission. > > What about its spam filtering, such as /etc/mail/access and DNSBLs etc? > pkg install $some_spam_filtering_software_of_your_choice That's not what belongs into base.