Date: Mon, 16 Feb 1998 08:56:36 -0600 From: David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs Linux Message-ID: <199802161456.IAA25064@nospam.hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: Message from "Jim C. Joseph" <jcjoseph@wt.net> of "Sun, 15 Feb 1998 21:55:59 GMT." <Pine.BSF.3.96.980215215237.15239A-100000@kosh.home.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jim C. Joseph writes: > > I would agree with some points. FreeBSD is a real server OS. I have mine > running NFS, NIS, SMBD, and as an internet router. It handles pretty well. > That is why my Sparc is there for only photoshop. But to be fair, Solaris > on an Ultra could put both of these in the trash(That is assuming you have > $15000 lying around ;). Has anyone seen the $3k Sun Ultra 5 currently being advertised? We have a number of Ultra-1's at work, and one dual CPU Ultra something. Haven't felt the need to benchmark 'em against my FreeBSD P-133 other than observing that I'm happy to keep a task on the P-133 as long as I can before it has to be moved to its final resting place on the Sparc. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net ===================================================================== The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199802161456.IAA25064>