From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 19 21:53:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856E216A518 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 21:53:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from poczta.o2.pl (mx.go2.pl [193.17.41.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B82A43D55 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 21:53:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from knockefreebsd@o2.pl) Received: from ALFA (aaf223.warszawa.sdi.tpnet.pl [217.97.85.223]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by poczta.o2.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC0A137701; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 22:53:27 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <004e01c4e615$70234d80$df5561d9@ALFA> From: "Heinz Knocke" To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" References: <003501c4e228$5f2cd780$df5561d9@ALFA> <006301c4e2f4$26a67fc0$df5561d9@ALFA> Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 22:55:18 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Marvell 88E8001 on sk0 and RELENG_5_3 - big problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 21:53:32 -0000 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" To: "Heinz Knocke" Cc: Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 2:45 PM Subject: Re: Marvell 88E8001 on sk0 and RELENG_5_3 - big problems > would you mind trying this patch. It should only activate jumbo frames > conditional on interface MTU like we do for xmacii. >=20 >=20 > Index: sys/pci/if_sk.c > (...) I tried this one and seems to work corectly :) Jumbograms were used, = data stream was smooth,=20 I haven't seen any error messages in system log.=20 In rough tests I had a little bit better speeds than with this one:=20 http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/dev/pci/if_sk.c.diff?r1=3D1= .51&r2=3D1.52 But I only tried netperf with maximal message send size on similar = boxes, if you'd like some other tests,=20 let me know the details.=20 By the way - do you know if sk(4) driver supports device polling (man 4 = polling)? I know there were some plans to make it work, but I couldn't found any up2date information.=20 hk