From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 9 11:45:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8929106568F for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:45:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nick@anywi.com) Received: from baranao.anywi.com (baranao.anywi.com [213.207.101.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A498FC0C for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:45:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nick@anywi.com) Received: from hind.van-laarhoven.org (ip51cfcfde.direct-adsl.nl [81.207.207.222]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by baranao.anywi.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A29183F41F for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 13:25:41 +0200 (CEST) From: Nick Hibma Organization: AnyWi To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 12:55:19 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.4 (FreeBSD/7.2-STABLE; KDE/4.2.4; i386; ; ) References: <3131aa530907051440l7ea1fa87y13edb3595fcf93e1@mail.gmail.com> <20090707125458.GA2233@psconsult.nl> In-Reply-To: <20090707125458.GA2233@psconsult.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200907091255.19779.nick@anywi.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on baranao.anywi.com Subject: Re: Patch for adding label support to NanoBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:45:31 -0000 There is a typo at the end of the script cp /etc/fstap /cfg It probably should be fstab there, no? Nick > On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 11:40:11PM +0200, Olivier Cochard-Labb=E9 wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > here is a patch that add label support to NanoBSD: This remove the > > need of generate different image (ad0 or da0 boot drive). > > You can download this patch here (tested on current): > > http://bsdrp.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bsdrp/trunk/nanobsd.glabel.patc > >h > > I like the idea but what does this mean for upgrading existing NanoBSD > installations? From reading the patch it looks like the new _.disk.image > file is not compatible with an existing installation and would be a POLA > violation. > > Perhaps a configuration option to choose between the old and new naming > can be added? > > > I've merge the 2 update script updatep1 and updatep2 in one script, > > and adapt them to this new label use. > > You can download this new update script here: > > http://bsdrp.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bsdrp/trunk/Files/usr/local/bin > >/upgrade > > This makes life easier for sure. > > Notes on the script itself: > - use glabel status instead of glabel list to find the provider name, > this makes the script easier to follow and less vulnerable to future > changes in the (verbose) output of glabel list. > - # Check and set final >>varible<< should be spelled variable. > > -- > Paul Schenkeveld > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-embedded > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-embedded-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" =2D-=20 AnyWi Technologies