From owner-freebsd-current Wed Oct 29 14:57:58 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA22484 for current-outgoing; Wed, 29 Oct 1997 14:57:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current) Received: from usr02.primenet.com (tlambert@usr02.primenet.com [206.165.6.202]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA22479 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 1997 14:57:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tlambert@usr02.primenet.com) Received: (from tlambert@localhost) by usr02.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA16083; Wed, 29 Oct 1997 15:54:20 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199710292254.PAA16083@usr02.primenet.com> Subject: Re: bad system call - world build To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 22:54:18 +0000 (GMT) Cc: phk@critter.freebsd.dk, mike@smith.net.au, helbig@Informatik.BA-Stuttgart.DE, freebsd-current@freefall.FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199710290704.XAA16634@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from "Satoshi Asami" at Oct 28, 97 11:04:57 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > * I may be dense here, but what do you think is the "real" solution ? > > I wouldn't be asking here if I knew. ;) > > Do you know why it doesn't work now? Your commit message appears to > indicate that this is supposed to work. Could the fact that the > environment variables are pointing to the newly built shared libraries > have something to do with this? (Just a wild guess.) I thought that if getcwd() returned ENOSYS, then the library fell back to the old code? Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.