From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Apr 9 9:46:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from hub.lovett.com (hub.lovett.com [216.60.121.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8722337B422; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 09:46:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ade@lovett.com) Received: from ade by hub.lovett.com with local (Exim 3.22 #1) id 14meo6-0005Nz-00; Mon, 09 Apr 2001 11:46:26 -0500 Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 11:46:26 -0500 From: Ade Lovett To: The Hermit Hacker , Maxim Sobolev , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Imagemagick doesn't know about freetype2 ... Message-ID: <20010409114626.B20461@FreeBSD.org> References: <3AD1DA69.41F7B257@FreeBSD.org> <20010409191712.C2827@ringworld.oblivion.bg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010409191712.C2827@ringworld.oblivion.bg>; from roam@orbitel.bg on Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 07:17:12PM +0300 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 07:17:12PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > And what about the many ports in the tree which want to use FreeType 2, > but do not really need X? Should they be made dependent on X then? Of course not. You can, with a bit of imagination, force the a port to install in ${X11BASE} without it being dependent on X. The more rationally correct thing to do would be to disable the built-in freetype2 support, and simply depend on print/freetype2. That way everything works. -aDe -- Ade Lovett, Austin, TX. ade@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message