From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 25 07:23:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ED25106564A for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 07:23:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28DDB8FC1B for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 07:23:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwk3 with SMTP id 3so1307518qwk.13 for ; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 00:23:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=sDrgFtbrsUszdF1BLC3QeDpYFLzS9eDGIHy1MZfhXog=; b=TIIcHJRTY1/7UPZYDqkCZFaTv9Jf9fJL6tzcH7HYTB5QAWbhOB+yWM7IaD9s7JZDRF 9/m+RYhmBC296eo6cBktawmth0lV9IhfHBmfu/GxIqvhgpXpu6DzwWpLwHdWSJZLEfii tYs3eZQ4QApU2LL8Z4As78wDX89/Zbn3n6Qgc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=aCclZolD1KBXUh/hvdzd7KWq30aJwPLduMWjOReTT+qLldW8DTlcesrmq1v0iVLwrD w0nuGgZ1Q1T2kTm7TylGelK0IZ6YjeLkfhDOgz6GjNPm4dIbG6KTUZtwXhFLVivyiwzz k5Sv1/KKf4WanG3ls+dge/exnOUOSWwj35t00= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.96.209 with SMTP id i17mr4648663qan.132.1280042632935; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 00:23:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.29.71 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 00:23:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C4BA50B.6050507@langille.org> <4C4BB672.3090109@langille.org> Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 02:23:52 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Edho P Arief Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-stable , Dan Langille Subject: Re: gpart -b 34 versus gpart -b 1024 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 07:23:54 -0000 On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 2:22 AM, Edho P Arief wrote: > > shouldn't it start at 2049? Starting at 2048 means it starts at 2048th > logical block which is 512 bytes off from physical block, doesn't it? > > blocks start at 0 -- Adam Vande More