From owner-freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat May 15 01:51:50 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-i386@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D249B16A4CE
	for <freebsd-i386@freebsd.org>; Sat, 15 May 2004 01:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atrium61.its.brooklyn.cuny.edu (atrium61.its.brooklyn.cuny.edu
	[146.245.252.61])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D8B43D55
	for <freebsd-i386@freebsd.org>; Sat, 15 May 2004 01:51:49 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jqu@its.brooklyn.cuny.edu)
Received: from atrium67.its.brooklyn.cuny.edu (atrium67.its.brooklyn.cuny.edu
	[146.245.252.67])id i4F8pmui005870
	for <freebsd-i386@freebsd.org>; Sat, 15 May 2004 04:51:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (jqu@localhost)with ESMTP id i4F8pl74005649
	for <freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 15 May 2004 04:51:47 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: atrium67.its.brooklyn.cuny.edu: jqu owned process
	doing -bs
Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 04:51:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jianqin Qu <jqu@its.brooklyn.cuny.edu>
To: freebsd-i386@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0405150430500.5633@atrium67.its.brooklyn.cuny.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: Request to remove follow-up for PR i386/64656 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-i386@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: I386-specific issues for FreeBSD <freebsd-i386.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-i386>,
	<mailto:freebsd-i386-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-i386>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-i386@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-i386-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-i386>,
	<mailto:freebsd-i386-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 08:51:51 -0000

Hi, there,

I'm sorry that I found my follow-up to the original PR i386/64656
was attached the wrong patch or the patch is in a wrong way. Thus
results in huge amount of junk text.  While a follow-up for the
third time put the patch in the right way, the huge junk resulting
from previous follow-ups make it unreadable.

SO I'm requesting to remove all my follow-ups for PR i386/64656. I will
repost the right followup with patches after the removal so that the post
is more readable.

Thanks!

Jianqin Qu