From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 12 21:02:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42AFB1065676 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 21:02:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847768FC1A for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 21:02:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.topspin.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id AAA01288; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 00:02:02 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost.topspin.kiev.ua ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.topspin.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1OYQ8Y-000HLy-CP; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 00:02:02 +0300 Message-ID: <4C3B82C9.7070301@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 00:02:01 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100603) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Roberson References: <4C246CD0.3020606@freebsd.org> <20100702082754.S14969@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <4C320E6E.4040007@freebsd.org> <20100705171155.K14969@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <4C321409.2070500@freebsd.org> <4C343C68.8010302@freebsd.org> <4C36FB32.30901@freebsd.org> <4C39B0E6.3090400@freebsd.org> <4C39B7DE.3030100@freebsd.org> <4C3A39E9.1070505@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4C3A39E9.1070505@freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: elf obj load: skip zero-sized sections early X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 21:02:06 -0000 on 12/07/2010 00:38 Andriy Gapon said the following: > on 12/07/2010 00:15 Jeff Roberson said the following: [snip] >> I appreciate your analysis but I don't understand the motivation for >> changing working code. > > Primary reason is that the "working code" produces zero-sized unused/unnecessary I think that my use of quotes was inappropriate in this sentence. The code is indeed working, just with that certain side-effect. > pcpu_set sections. See the subject line. As to why I care about those sections > - please see the start of this thread. -- Andriy Gapon