From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 08:02:54 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D0D1C97 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 08:02:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-x236.google.com (mail-pd0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70BFE301 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 08:02:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f182.google.com with SMTP id g10so6695966pdj.41 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 01:02:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=m99cvfJfCK81OoALV+kndodTEBP3MYiukD3w6q9sO70=; b=j/TiHTlqcdLcAvwFwWWVcV8gaRCdixReQAVp+79W6maekBaXhZBvcU6qT1Nej5O253 fuhbSwXuJMGH/ftRbDKT1Y0Gm+OJj5FlanKiJvseQ0UR4MWYhYZHypimthTqvOtNkg5x HM9YsqtwZrxPLR/AJuXE6kkuN37Af1zC2ZblOtsQU+Q0SWbZAnuIlZsdLz3mAeKAQwgf FvlC99Xw9M20jLZnNxw8BVsXniBQn6CFys3sITriVkZs0ZLiY6/L6rQ0EI9yFsKD9Al9 3DptknlI3SRO+537s+XqlvHGRcZvM+07A2rnKm4LX1WA/yh5wPEc3lUMwoKdCU33qefZ zr5g== X-Received: by 10.68.37.42 with SMTP id v10mr38375688pbj.127.1394438574030; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 01:02:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pyunyh@gmail.com (lpe4.p59-icn.cdngp.net. [114.111.62.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q7sm62338206pbc.20.2014.03.10.01.02.51 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 10 Mar 2014 01:02:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pyunyh@gmail.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:02:47 +0900 From: Yonghyeon PYUN Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:02:47 +0900 To: "Michael L. Squires" Subject: Re: Broadcomm bge in Dell 745/FreeBSD 10-STABLE = no gigabit Ethernet Message-ID: <20140310080247.GA1399@michelle.cdnetworks.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 08:02:54 -0000 On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 09:41:57PM -0500, Michael L. Squires wrote: > > I'm unable to get a Broadcom DCM5754 GigeE (allegedly) interface on a Dell > 745 desktop to talk gigabit Ethernet. > > It works fine at 100 Mbits/full duplex and works fine, to the extent that > one > can tell, under Windows 7 x64 and Centos 5. > > Attempts to force it to gigabit through options in rc.conf fail. > > The errors look like those reported some years ago for another 745, but I > would have guessed that that particular problem no longer existed. > > I have a workaround (installing an Intel 1000 MT into a PCI slot) so this is > not a critical problem. I'm using the 745 to control an HP MSL6000 tape > library (2 LTO-3 drives) and amanda from ports and dump are working without > problems, thank you very much. > > Mike Squires > mikes@siralan.org > UN*X at home > Since 1986 > > >From dmesg: > > FreeBSD 10.0-STABLE #0 r262738: Tue Mar 4 11:42:23 EST 2014 > root@testbsd:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/TESTBSD amd64 > FreeBSD clang version 3.3 (tags/RELEASE_33/final 183502) 20130610 > CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13GHz (2126.49-MHz K8-class > CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6f2 Family = 0x6 Model = 0xf Stepping > = 2 > Features=0xbfebfbff > avail memory = 4038057984 (3850 MB) > > bge0: CHIP ID 0x0000b002; ASIC REV 0x0b; CHIP REV 0xb0; PCI-E > miibus0: on bge0 > brgphy0: PHY 1 on miibus0 > brgphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, > 1000baseT-m > aster, 1000baseT-FDX, 1000baseT-FDX-master, auto, auto-flow > bge0: Ethernet address: 00:19:b9:37:0c:b21 > [...] When a remote link parter supports 1000baseT you should not use manual media configuration. If you plug in the UTP cable to other host, do you still see 100baseTX with auto-negotiation? I'm not sure but I think this is first report that tells 1000baseT link establishment issue. Did it ever work on FreeBSD?