From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep  6 13:37:17 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61357106566B;
	Tue,  6 Sep 2011 13:37:17 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from geo.liaskos@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com
	[209.85.216.175])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E94F38FC1A;
	Tue,  6 Sep 2011 13:37:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by qyk4 with SMTP id 4so511584qyk.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 06:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=ep2DT6AmXS5wrQY1G7EzCHbfVz2QoiGPaa8dkP3c5ik=;
	b=hbjkEH8fm60owvfAj5IgDZHIt6LMC2mAgNX3EWLL2Hz2sPQt91rnIDbDcNEceN2Ga+
	hhn1qZ3Mm0qzu1G+WtJw3NMs5fVUI3iJUG/yoNN2ArqJiSXSkh3WSYEZ30JfKXOzdcp8
	CDGp7xlWypQzTnZJTkes75LPPtptUV9GxjSwE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.168.146 with SMTP id u18mr3465017qay.235.1315316236136;
	Tue, 06 Sep 2011 06:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.89.138 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 06:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CADLo838GPvqCJP1BTgg9naHAfdX6asTN5v7Vpns=Y32g9Hd8Fg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4E64CDA3.2010907@eskk.nu>
	<CADLo839imyvNQE9-KcAjZKSdRr3X1hAYV_szoaJu5qBTh4NgHQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E64D9AB.2040702@eskk.nu>
	<CADLo83_Xyr71f6jCc40xV-sL_aiAXsnZOemg619yAwxHcAsQww@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110905153115.GA69747@azathoth.lan>
	<20110905161132.GA84391@elch.exwg.net>
	<20110905164402.GB70234@azathoth.lan> <4E6526E8.9020901@eskk.nu>
	<20110906065415.GA2184@reindeer.exwg.net>
	<20110906120954.GB80802@azathoth.lan> <4E661254.2000000@yandex.ru>
	<CANcjpOAumf97AvqhZQbWnjwTgkSFY3eZtLgtPFLjBxNJONivdQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADLo838GPvqCJP1BTgg9naHAfdX6asTN5v7Vpns=Y32g9Hd8Fg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:37:16 +0300
Message-ID: <CANcjpODMQhPdP2=ZjMngnuDcty9QRVkpGv68+OAWDeuup0GkMg@mail.gmail.com>
From: George Liaskos <geo.liaskos@gmail.com>
To: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: office@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: libreoffice-3.4.3 fails to upgrade
X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD <freebsd-office.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-office>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-office-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-office>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-office@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-office-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-office>,
	<mailto:freebsd-office-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 13:37:17 -0000

> There's always a reason behind the madness :)
>
> More internal dependencies that can be ripped out of LibreOffice means
> that compilation time is shorter, we have smaller packages, the
> software uses less disk space. This is why we have shared libraries.
>
> Bapt and others (possibly including you?) have done a fantastic job in
> sorting these dependencies-- it's worthwhile!
>
> Unfortunately there're teething problems with the dependencies, but
> when they're fixed it'll be much better.
>
> Chris
>

I understand this completely but db is not like, ICU for example.
It's quite small and i wonder if the cost outweights the benefit.

>btw there is still bugs with icons and .desktop
>(wanting libreoffice34).

Can you please be more specific, unfortunately i had no time to
compile LO after the version bump.

There are mtree issues for sure, but i don't really know how to resolve them.
I describe them in my previews email.

http://pastebin.com/Pi5A84fj


Regards,
George