From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 25 20:24:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECEF016A4BF for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 20:24:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dglawrence.com (12-224-163-157.client.attbi.com [12.224.163.157]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 587A343FBD for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 20:24:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dg@nexus.dglawrence.com) Received: from nexus.dglawrence.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dglawrence.com (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h7Q3Q7nV047300; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 20:26:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dg@nexus.dglawrence.com) Received: (from dg@localhost) by nexus.dglawrence.com (8.12.9/8.12.3/Submit) id h7Q3Q6jW047296; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 20:26:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 20:26:06 -0700 From: "David G. Lawrence" To: Peter Wemm Message-ID: <20030826032606.GC61917@nexus.dglawrence.com> References: <5.2.0.9.0.20030825220024.07324008@209.112.4.2> <20030826022000.25AC22A7EA@canning.wemm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030826022000.25AC22A7EA@canning.wemm.org> cc: Mike Silbersack cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PAE removal patch for testing X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 03:24:21 -0000 > Mike Tancsa wrote: > > At 04:51 PM 25/08/2003 -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote: > > > > >Right now, anyone who is experiencing problems should definitely try that > > >short patch which Mike Tancsa said works for him and confirm whether or > > >not it fixes the issue on their system. > > > > The 2 servers I am running it on both have been stable since applying it. > > ns4% uptime > > 9:58PM up 2 days, 4:27, 2 users, load averages: 0.02, 0.03, 0.05 > > ns4% > > > > would have rebooted several times by now. The other machine is also > > stable. Both are quite busy mail routers. One also runs spamassassin via a > > milter. > > This change matches -current and should probably be committed ASAP. I've reviewed it as well and it definitely is a bug that needs to be fixed ASAP. Basically, the pmap_remove code in -stable doesn't handle the case of crossing a page table boundry properly. If the next page table page isn't currently mapped, then the kernel will [fatally] fault when trying to access it. -DG David G. Lawrence Download Technologies, Inc. - http://www.downloadtech.com - (866) 399 8500 TeraSolutions, Inc. - http://www.terasolutions.com - (888) 346 7175 The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org Pave the road of life with opportunities.