From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 30 07:41:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F68016A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 07:41:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail3.panix.com (mail3.panix.com [166.84.1.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8115643D39 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 07:41:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from panix.com (brillig.panix.com [166.84.1.76]) by mail3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B03984BA for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 10:41:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from teddy.fas.com (pcp01010374pcs.mplsnt01.sc.comcast.net [68.58.176.69]) by panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6539B2AA0E for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 10:41:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from stan by teddy.fas.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Amam3-00053g-00 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 10:41:39 -0500 Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 10:41:39 -0500 From: stan To: Free BSD Questions list Message-ID: <20040130154139.GA19301@teddy.fas.com> Mail-Followup-To: Free BSD Questions list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Editor: gVim X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.23 X-Uptime: 10:39:41 up 25 days, 21:43, 1 user, load average: 0.11, 0.11, 0.09 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Stan Brown Subject: Using bind9, instead of the default bind8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:41:55 -0000 What's involed in using bind9, instead of the default bind 8. I have made the port, but it seems that I probably need to somehow delete the existing bind8, right? I see the entry in /etc/defaults/mak.conf that instructs the buld process to not build it, but I already did a make world before finding that. -- "They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin