From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 1 12:59:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D9437B401; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 12:59:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.BAYAREA.NET [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9CEE43FEC; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 12:59:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h61JxODZ018683; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 12:59:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@ns1.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h61JxONt018682; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 12:59:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 12:59:24 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Josef Karthauser Message-ID: <20030701195924.GB18509@ns1.xcllnt.net> References: <20030701143122.GB792@genius.tao.org.uk> <20030701174636.GB6789@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20030701193405.GD2413@genius.tao.org.uk> <20030701194317.GA18509@ns1.xcllnt.net> <20030701195038.GE2413@genius.tao.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030701195038.GE2413@genius.tao.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Problems with vmware-3.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 19:59:25 -0000 On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 08:50:38PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote: > > > > RH8 is at 2.4.18. The linuxulator sets the value to 2.4.2 as that > > was the kernel revision in RH 7.2 > > Therefore: try 2.4.18 > > > > Ahha, that appears to work: > sysctl compat.linux.osrelease=2.4.18 > > I've since found that I was nailing the values in /etc/sysctl.conf, > #compat.linux.osname=FreeBSD > #compat.linux.osrelease=5.0-current > so that opera reported the correct things. This was actually the primary reason for having osname and osrelease in the first place: people wanted their Linux browser to report FreeBSD :-) BTW: you can have this on a per-jail basis, so you have a way to have opera report FreeBSD, while still making Vmware happy. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net