From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 18 21:31:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 096942A3 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 21:31:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.made4.biz (mail.made4.biz [IPv6:2001:41d0:2:c018::1:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDD65EA7 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 21:31:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 2a02-8428-011b-e000-0290-f5ff-fe9d-b78c.rev.sfr.net ([2a02:8428:11b:e000:290:f5ff:fe9d:b78c] helo=magellan.dumbbell.fr) by mail.made4.biz with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.84 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YOCDt-000KzA-1v for freebsd-x11@freebsd.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 22:31:57 +0100 Message-ID: <54E504C5.7010105@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 22:31:49 +0100 From: =?windows-1252?Q?Jean-S=E9bastien_P=E9dron?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Call for testers] DRM device-independent code update to Linux 3.8 References: <54E3D2A0.2090903@FreeBSD.org> <20150218212046.GA37911@alchemy.franken.de> In-Reply-To: <20150218212046.GA37911@alchemy.franken.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AmrNg4PgrT4cd2w6wJ57liU2urDRExlML" X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 21:31:59 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --AmrNg4PgrT4cd2w6wJ57liU2urDRExlML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 18.02.2015 22:20, Marius Strobl wrote: > Have you looked into using a MTX_SPIN lock where Linux actually > employs a DRM_SPINTYPE one? No, but I'll definitely look into this. I will surely come back with questions :) --=20 Jean-S=E9bastien P=E9dron --AmrNg4PgrT4cd2w6wJ57liU2urDRExlML Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJU5QTGXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NzA4N0ZEMUFFQUUwRTEyREJDNkE2RjAz OUU5OTc2MUE1RkQ5NENDAAoJEDnpl2Gl/ZTMAvEP/A48eEj0CXpj4xy5aAmNbzau W/UyxEx9WTCoRiCpyn7MSkMQou1yXjGLgWQuAOAVD/js4JxPTuk0BG5dm/CQAD28 +tXCMPASopmUMvgsQMqWCXDuK3HXu4creqQgwl5E/1VZHMq4+aOdpUDPUcRVDPFM pH485Ru+x2OMllStFGVfKoKvsBKIukPJQeB2R5RipEZJGTVy0tM8+bS9BRT9JgsM VzXADI6CHiaBaqmvXX41leIxpYIUDhBiW1W83BLPzK5KDkgUh+kNTsAHDDce9tIY KrPOGvAjTPjCWb93EHkIXXbWA4mwpPQCj/FzGgqyzuODq9QiaO9Na2WMUZarbApK ghYZ0jf02BfGVssj9nFgqan4y0pDzNqZhqX6bEHis1cmHn48FpfZiaVJmDKFlgDs 55ifb29KMYHY2SL0GSGfxmfVOnWyaaqY8lb2WwvYqJzSJmY5KXJXwUAjSCppyllC 39mEuYojNlMuoFfy3vPHmaVLc2DlgsTIlnE9E6XEMLP7ycPWDbVdYKfH+lRRr5zv rU9s3fDmQmsqzLfDUZi3RllYMj82WdANwdrAFcdVB4IFzVpIHJss2jEpDj3XPTr5 07c2OGwDH7HNpANjmDfuNfeElQQWhRJ48Sahxa23qENw9QOq0AoS8XgKIH2Omd7e GiTx91ol5AmEn7zjLXo/ =79bi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AmrNg4PgrT4cd2w6wJ57liU2urDRExlML--