From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Sep 8 11:49:38 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk (nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk [193.237.89.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B91E156C2 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 1999 11:49:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk) Received: (from nik@localhost) by nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA90186; Wed, 8 Sep 1999 19:45:48 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from nik) Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 19:45:48 +0100 From: Nik Clayton To: Brett Glass Cc: Rod Taylor , chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Looking for the actual proposal... Message-ID: <19990908194548.A89429@catkin.nothing-going-on.org> References: <4.2.0.58.19990907215517.047c9880@localhost> <99090807163506.00470@a11.idiotswitch.org> <4.2.0.58.19990908091226.047c96f0@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.19990908091226.047c96f0@localhost>; from Brett Glass on Wed, Sep 08, 1999 at 09:32:27AM -0600 Organization: FreeBSD Project Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Brett, I think this is where the problem is: On Wed, Sep 08, 1999 at 09:32:27AM -0600, Brett Glass wrote: > is that FreeBSD is lacking in good memes, which are more important than good > code. On a very fundamental level, I think a lot of the FreeBSD developers (note, not necessarily the users) disagree very strongly with that statement. I doubt that you can change their minds. N -- [intentional self-reference] can be easily accommodated using a blessed, non-self-referential dummy head-node whose own object destructor severs the links. -- Tom Christiansen in <375143b5@cs.colorado.edu> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message