From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Jul 11 7:10: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from axl.ops.uunet.co.za (axl.ops.uunet.co.za [196.31.2.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84B8037C016; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 07:09:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sheldonh@axl.ops.uunet.co.za) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.ops.uunet.co.za) by axl.ops.uunet.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.15 #1) id 13C0j3-000LTm-00; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 16:09:29 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Darren Henderson , "David O'Brien" , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bringing LPRng into FreeBSD? - License Issues In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 11 Jul 2000 15:51:58 +0200." <82343.963323518@axl.ops.uunet.co.za> Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 16:09:29 +0200 Message-ID: <82569.963324569@axl.ops.uunet.co.za> Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 11 Jul 2000 15:51:58 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > I'm pretty sure that there's very little to be gained by importing LPRng > into the base system, since: Having sent that message, I regret it. I don't care about LPRng and lpr. I care about a more general problem and I shouldn't get involved in peripheral arguments. :-) Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message