From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 18 16:44:37 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9211D16A41B for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 16:44:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmmtao105.cox.net (eastrmmtao105.cox.net [68.230.240.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD8513C46A for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 16:44:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmimpo02.cox.net ([68.1.16.120]) by eastrmmtao105.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20070918164431.GVPW28290.eastrmmtao105.cox.net@eastrmimpo02.cox.net>; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:44:31 -0400 Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([24.255.149.218]) by eastrmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id pskW1X0054iy4EG0000000; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:44:31 -0400 Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:48:13 -0500 To: RW From: "Jeremy Messenger" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <46EFE5E6.9000602@cosmozilla.net> <20070918172922.32c0b904@gumby.homeunix.com.> Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20070918172922.32c0b904@gumby.homeunix.com.> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.23 (Linux) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: autoconf/automake guru wanted [gnuplot-4.0 with patches] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 16:44:37 -0000 On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:29:22 -0500, RW wrot= e: > On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 07:51:18 -0700 > Ted Thomas wrote: > >> I'm sorry if this sounds like a complaint. I just spent 2 days >> attempting to salvage a sane 6.2 development box which does not use >> X-Windows, because I stumbled into the Xorg quagmire. Recognizing >> that the ports system is itself a remarkable achievement, I would >> distill my concern down to one thing: naming conventions. >> >> Example 1: autoconf/automake >> >> autoconf-2.59_3 =3D up-to-date with port >> autoconf-2.61_2 =3D up-to-date with port > These two are no problem, they are different ports. > >> autoconf-wrapper-20070404 =3D up-to-date with port >> .. >> automake-wrapper-20070404 =3D up-to-date with port > > This shouldn't happen, do you have multiple entries in /var/db/pkg? Did you misread it? :-) The *-wrapper is correct and normal. # pkg_info -IX wrapper autoconf-wrapper-20070404 Wrapper script for GNU autoconf automake-wrapper-20070404 Wrapper script for GNU automake Cheers, Mezz -- = mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team - FreeBSD Multimedia Hat (ports, not src) http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org http://wiki.freebsd.org/multimedia - multimedia@FreeBSD.org