From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Nov 26 18:25:22 1995 Return-Path: owner-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id SAA21082 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 26 Nov 1995 18:25:22 -0800 Received: from jhome.DIALix.COM (root@jhome.DIALix.COM [192.203.228.69]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id SAA21069 for ; Sun, 26 Nov 1995 18:24:56 -0800 Received: (from peter@localhost) by jhome.DIALix.COM (8.6.12/8.6.9) id KAA20506; Mon, 27 Nov 1995 10:24:26 +0800 Date: Mon, 27 Nov 1995 10:24:23 +0800 (WST) From: Peter Wemm To: Satoshi Asami cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Repository copy request: (part of) ports/net -> ports/www In-Reply-To: <199511270015.QAA29002@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, 26 Nov 1995, Satoshi Asami wrote: > * OK, done. > > Thanks. I did the rest of the work, namely removing all ports from > their former locations, adjusting the subdir Makefiles and module > paths. I decided to get lazy and write a script for the "special case" of the non-tagged ports heirachy. Boy, am I glad Satoshi slapped me back to my senses when I suggested he branch the 2.1 tree rather than freeze.. > After you copy utils/Makefile (which is in the Attic now) to misc, > I'll change the new category names in ports/Makefile and commit the > new INDEX. And then that should be it. BTW, I dont know how much of an issue it is to have a permanently buildable ports tree, but I can move rather than copy the files all in the same step. This would leave the SUBDIR tree broken.... -Peter > Thanks! > > Satoshi >