From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May  4 22:32:28 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 638A3318
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Mon,  4 May 2015 22:32:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ruggedinbox.com (ruggedinbox.com [94.156.77.238])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1968F1128
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Mon,  4 May 2015 22:32:27 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <CAB=2f8yy4TyHk+vfxEC+rBm0U2tEz=L=YUfzmW_p8LTZQQ6RGw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <b512debfc49e6e68ac725d0b03570f84.squirrel@ikornapostur.1984.is>
 <04594F43-C6FD-4798-ACFF-8BB7179A905F@bsdimp.com>
 <BAY182-W54AD6CD23741D63E45FBEA2040@phx.gbl>
 <CA+D9QhtEhKBJyuUVg7arG7tqSAbJ1g--4Rj2Trpp43-1mvUBLA@mail.gmail.com>
 <BAY182-W762BE2999779F14F7FD736A2040@phx.gbl>
 <CA+D9QhuLXOBJn8ZiN+894rgQLVXvNWVZ2Xqq75Yjtz8s-KwvGg@mail.gmail.com>
 <5FD36BF9-2FAD-40ED-AE67-D8B1E3274CB1@gromit.dlib.vt.edu>
 <552FCD90.20401@foxvalley.net> <462bae1cb99.7f9417c1@mail.schwarzes.net>
 <CAB=2f8yW-SM48DGpDn9uuwBawUzCqtUCVT8oeZ+h_6-pVrjdTw@mail.gmail.com>
 <46369db827.17451cd@mail.schwarzes.net>
 <CAB=2f8yBiX73xt5cnAsVuNDTgQtWa5o2JoX8382CLgTxU0Y=1A@mail.gmail.com>
 <6F344CF15E884BD18A98FBD97B07C79F@ad.peach.ne.jp>
 <4638dd5894c.cba746c@mail.schwarzes.net>
 <CAB=2f8z-u7EKHYbAGgzym0iekFAsTDY5afbVhXSopeEVXwy39g@mail.gmail.com>
 <463a6790209.18821d3f@mail.schwarzes.net>
 <DE28CB6B-9087-4C28-BB55-03B0D1F7BADF@ruggedinbox.com>
 <CAB=2f8yy4TyHk+vfxEC+rBm0U2tEz=L=YUfzmW_p8LTZQQ6RGw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10.1 / 11 on a Raspberry Pi B+ / 2 ?
From: Nathaniel Goodman <nathanielgoodman@ruggedinbox.com>
Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 22:32:20 +0000
To: Luiz Otavio O Souza <lists.br@gmail.com>
CC: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <EADDFEE1-650A-4AB7-821C-6AC0BA301333@ruggedinbox.com>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 22:32:28 -0000

On May 4, 2015 10:34:49 PM GMT+01:00, Luiz Otavio O Souza <lists.br@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 4 May 2015 at 06:54, Nathaniel Goodman wrote:
>[...]
>>
>> I wonder, would this work on a *banana* pi?
>>
>> Other than a thread about u-boot for banana pi, I could not find much
>info about running fbsd on that hardware.
>>
>
>No, banana pi is based on allwinner A20 SoC.
>
>The support for this board (and others based on allwinner SoCs) is
>being improved, I'll soon post more details about them (u-boot, image
>creation).
>
>Luiz

I'll keep an eye out. The banana pi hw is pretty decent.