From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 9 05:29:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6BA116A4DA for ; Wed, 9 Aug 2006 05:29:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Received: from ebb.errno.com (ebb.errno.com [69.12.149.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E48A43D45 for ; Wed, 9 Aug 2006 05:29:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Received: from [10.0.0.248] (trouble.errno.com [10.0.0.248]) (authenticated bits=0) by ebb.errno.com (8.13.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k795TGRN071417 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Aug 2006 22:29:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Message-ID: <44D972AC.7000008@errno.com> Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 22:29:16 -0700 From: Sam Leffler User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060724) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Neil Short References: <20060809052451.84224.qmail@web56515.mail.re3.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20060809052451.84224.qmail@web56515.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ath0: device timeout X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 05:29:17 -0000 Neil Short wrote: > Followup to previous posting. > > I had noticed that a recent CURRENT update to my > system resulted in my WAN connection in my home > network to break down on this particular box (a > laptop.) > > stdout reports: > ath0: device timeout. > > The only thing that seems to bring it back up is a > reboot the laptop. > > Since there are some changes to the ath code as of the > past few days, I updated again but noticed no > improvement. > > Here's the new information: > I have been using WPA for all this time. When I go > back to the simpler (and less secure) WEP it seems I > can stay connected with impunity. > > Does this help? Not really.