From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 08:32:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1DF5106564A for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 08:32:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 446BB8FC12 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 08:32:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p048WEdG072448 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 4 Jan 2011 08:32:14 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk p048WEdG072448 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1294129935; bh=x1KDgn2EDmfBDvTft28SeyMvYg3wCEkndDkwwZATBHk=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4D22DB01.4080600@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20T ue,=2004=20Jan=202011=2008:32:01=20+0000|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(M acintosh=3B=20U=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20en-US=3B=20r v:1.9.2.13)=20Gecko/20101207=20Thunderbird/3.1.7|MIME-Version:=201 .0|To:=20"illoai@gmail.com"=20|CC:=20Chris=20Bre nnan=20,=20=0D=0A=20Jamie=20Paul=20Griffin=2 0,=0D=0A=20freebsd-questions@freebsd.org|Subject :=20Re:=20Portupgrade=20status|References:=20<14212432ba707fc5f9fb c75b56e8e783@flabnapple.net>=09<20101226214221.GB68570@stainmore>= 09 =09<86pqsogfvu.fsf@red.stonehenge.com>=09<4D186D11.1030708@infraca ninophile.co.uk>=09=09<20110103225455.GA37597@daemon.gnix.co.uk>=09=09=20|In-Reply-To:=20 |X-E nigmail-Version:=201.1.1|OpenPGP:=20id=3D60AE908C|Content-Type:=20 multipart/signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha1=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"app lication/pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------enig43C AB6343A2DDB60CC5EBC0E"; b=lzQufxPpqHRP7hYb/jCR2evBi8iwoXGD5gXZHQsE1aNoOH2K3TS/kUw1hXkdnp2fZ e8D+k7GfDjv+Kj8xbmHBOk0E3Qpqw8rVQNw8nGvzubVm9sxzMq0IEr1NEjKvfysr9T dHsSc/dvpTnkl8dl0Faa+uGoY9RhEUEj1DVuJFmI= Message-ID: <4D22DB01.4080600@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 08:32:01 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "illoai@gmail.com" References: <14212432ba707fc5f9fbc75b56e8e783@flabnapple.net> <20101226214221.GB68570@stainmore> <86pqsogfvu.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <4D186D11.1030708@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20110103225455.GA37597@daemon.gnix.co.uk> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig43CAB6343A2DDB60CC5EBC0E" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Jamie Paul Griffin , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Chris Brennan Subject: Re: Portupgrade status X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 08:32:20 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig43CAB6343A2DDB60CC5EBC0E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04/01/2011 00:51, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > No, the -R flag in portmaster tells it to not rebuild > ports taht have already been built on this run (I > believe from reading man portmaster). The -R > flag in portupgrade rebuilds the ports on which > the named port depends > -R > --upward-recursive Act on all those packages required by the given > packages as well. (When specified with -F, = fetch > recursively, including the brand new, unins= talled > ports that an upgraded port requires) >=20 > I don't see any equivalent functionality for portmaster, > sadly. This is actually portmaster's default behaviour. So: portupgrade -R foo/bar is equivalent to portmaster foo/bar portupgrade -fRr foo/bar is equivalent to portmaster -fr foo/bar There isn't actually a way to do the equivalent of portupgrade foo/bar -- that is, only update the specifically named port, without updating any dependencies as well. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig43CAB6343A2DDB60CC5EBC0E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk0i2w4ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxR4wCZAfYD5OKOrbrzKxaud27VY5P6 Q58An03qe1w5Qv42znecth3sTVcG1yAo =Ga+E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig43CAB6343A2DDB60CC5EBC0E--