From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Jul 16 2:24:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7700637B400 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 02:24:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB7543E58 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 02:24:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 16C85534A; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 11:24:40 +0200 (CEST) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Jordan K Hubbard Cc: jos@catnook.com, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Package system flaws? References: From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 16 Jul 2002 11:24:39 +0200 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jordan K Hubbard writes: > If libh ever makes it off the ground, you can bet that Tcl will enter > the base system fairly rapidly since it will be required for > everything from bootstrapping packages onto the system to actually > installing the system itself. I'm not a big fan of having Tcl in the base system, but - what are we waiting for? libh should have entered the tree a long time ago, there's absolutely nothing to be gained from leaving it out in the cold. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message