From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 27 09:00:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C901065693 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 09:00:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C09C8FC3F for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 09:00:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n7R90EWM092467 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 09:00:14 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n7R90ErY092466; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 09:00:14 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 09:00:14 GMT Message-Id: <200908270900.n7R90ErY092466@freefall.freebsd.org> To: ruby@FreeBSD.org From: Stanislav Sedov Cc: Subject: Re: ports/138100: [Update]databases/ruby-dbi:update to 0.4.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Stanislav Sedov List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 09:00:15 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/138100; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Stanislav Sedov To: wen heping Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/138100: [Update]databases/ruby-dbi:update to 0.4.2 Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:51:00 +0400 On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 07:14:02 +0800 wen heping mentioned: > Hi, stas@ : > > With its previous Makefile and Makefile.common, ruby-dbi and > other ruby-dbd_* is some dificult to update. And in my plan, I shall update > all the ruby-dbd_* ports which require ruby-dbi to the newest version > and use gem and modify the depends. > > I do not know which one is welcomed more for ruby port: gem > or not gem. If not gem, I will try to update it without gem and then > submit the new patch and close this PR. > > Cheers, > wen > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 5:40 AM, Stanislav Sedov wrote: > > > Hi Wen! > > > > Thanks for your patch! Personally, I'd prefer to stay back > > from switching to gem version as I don't see much benefit > > for this step. Why have you decided to switch to gem? > > Besides introducing new dependency on the old gem version, > > this will also possible break application that people use > > as this will require changes to this application sorce code > > to function properly with gems (require gems). > > > > Can you please, submit the patch against the current version > > without changing it to using gems? > > Yeah, I think that staying away from gems for this module is the preferrable way to go. You may submit the new patch to update ruby-dbd* ports as followup to this PR. Thanks! -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE