From owner-freebsd-current Mon Feb 12 16:52:34 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01EB437B684 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:52:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f1D0qFW33330; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:52:15 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Message-Id: <200102130052.f1D0qFW33330@harmony.village.org> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Subject: Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad for me...) Cc: Daniel Eischen , John Indra , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "13 Feb 2001 01:48:33 +0100." References: <3A887FAE.CF15C4BE@vigrid.com> <200102130046.f1D0klW33264@harmony.village.org> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:52:15 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: : Warner Losh writes: : > I'd rather see this patch, or something similar, than bump the major : > version again. We can phase in a better way to obviate the need to do : > this in the future. : : Brian Feldman, Peter Wemm, David O'Brien and myself have been : discussing possible solutions on IRC for the past two hours. Peter : will likely commit a patch sometime soon. If there's something better than Daniel's solution that doesn't require a major bump and is compatible with the old libc.so.5 api, then I'm all for that. I'd love to test it out as well if there's any desire for that. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message