From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 22:22:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D5116A405 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 22:22:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx24.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1DF8913C4AA for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 22:22:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 15432 invoked by uid 399); 9 Mar 2007 22:22:23 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.4?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Mar 2007 22:22:23 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Message-ID: <45F1DE1C.4020408@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 14:22:20 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b2 (Windows/20070116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Messenger References: <200703081412.l28EC8fq003028@repoman.freebsd.org> <200703091031.11485.kstewart@owt.com> <20070309215035.7d7430fc.jylefort@FreeBSD.org> <20070309224145.53836ae8.jylefort@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jean-Yves Lefort , cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, Kent Stewart , ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/deskutils/basket Makefile ports/security/gnutls Makefile ports/security/dirmngr Makefile ports/security/libotr Makefile ports/security/libgcrypt Makefile ports/security/gnupg Makefile ports/security/gpgme Makefile ports/security/libksba ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 22:22:24 -0000 Jeremy Messenger wrote: > The 104877 fix is not in ports tree right now, so I think we still need > to put an entry in UPDATING for our users' sake. I just started a thread on -ports@ for this topic, since now that I understand it, I agree that it's a more serious issue. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection