From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 16 07:12:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0F61065695; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 07:12:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from thyme.infocus-llc.com (server.infocus-llc.com [206.156.254.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11D28FC1A; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 07:12:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (c-75-64-226-141.hsd1.ms.comcast.net [75.64.226.141]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by thyme.infocus-llc.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 741AB37B470; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 01:52:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id DF9C661C57; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 01:52:33 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 01:52:33 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20100816065233.GA35264@over-yonder.net> References: <4C6505A4.9060203@FreeBSD.org> <4C650B75.3020800@FreeBSD.org> <4C651192.9020403@FreeBSD.org> <4C673898.2080609@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20-fullermd.4 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96 at thyme.infocus-llc.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras Subject: Re: Interpreted language(s) in the base X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 07:12:06 -0000 On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 11:15:55PM -0700 I heard the voice of Doug Barton, and lo! it spake thus: > > However, a bigger reason was that it was impossible to marry our > concept of a "stable" branch with the ever-evolving world that was > perl. This one at least is conceptually pretty easy to solve. We don't have any worries about how old or new the version of expat in base is; since it's not called libexpat, nothing but the stuff in base written specifically against it has to worry about it getting old, and upgrading it requires only checking against those things in base. So we could go right ahead and import perl, just renamed to 'bsdscript' 8-} -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.