From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 19:13:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7381D1065674 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:13:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rpaulo@freebsd.org) Received: from karen.lavabit.com (karen.lavabit.com [72.249.41.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDA18FC0C for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:13:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from d.earth.lavabit.com (d.earth.lavabit.com [192.168.111.13]) by karen.lavabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77EBE11B860; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:13:57 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 10.0.10.3 (221.163.108.93.rev.vodafone.pt [93.108.163.221]) by lavabit.com with ESMTP id ZP7P1N1NUXTV; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:13:57 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Rui Paulo In-Reply-To: <4CA26BB7.2090907@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 20:13:54 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <89382820-E423-432E-8346-ADABB9FEED7F@FreeBSD.org> References: <20100923.053236.231630719.hrs@allbsd.org> <4CA26BB7.2090907@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton , Hiroki Sato X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Call for testers: RFC 5569 (6rd) support in stf(4) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:13:58 -0000 On 28 Sep 2010, at 23:27, Doug Barton wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 9/22/2010 1:32 PM, Hiroki Sato wrote: > | Hello, > | > | Can anyone try a patch for adding 6rd (RFC 5569) support to stf(4)? > > Well I don't want to be "Mr. Negativity," but I'd like to suggest that > adding this support is the wrong way to go. STF and teredo are > transition mechanisms, and we're currently knee-deep (well maybe > ankle-deep) in the deployment of IPv6. This is only going to pick up > steam in the next few years given the impending run-out of the free /8s > in the IANA pool. I disagree with you and I want to see this going in. Regards, -- Rui Paulo