Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:42:32 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r242013 - head/sys/net Message-ID: <201210250942.32388.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20121024190553.GM70741@FreeBSD.org> References: <201210241833.q9OIXi77072545@svn.freebsd.org> <201210241442.33028.jhb@freebsd.org> <20121024190553.GM70741@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday, October 24, 2012 3:05:53 pm Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 02:42:33PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > J> On Wednesday, October 24, 2012 2:33:44 pm Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > J> > Author: glebius > J> > Date: Wed Oct 24 18:33:44 2012 > J> > New Revision: 242013 > J> > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/242013 > J> > > J> > Log: > J> > Fix fallout from r240071. If destination interface lookup fails, > J> > we should broadcast a packet, not try to deliver it to NULL. > J> > > J> > Reported by: rpaulo > J> > J> I wonder if this fixes the panic someone was reporting on net@ when removing > J> an interface from a bridge? > > I failed to find it on net@ or bugs@ in a timeframe after I committed > if_transmit patch to bridge. Ah, it was on current@: Subject: "panic possibly on on bridge member removal" It definitely had a null ifnet pointer. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201210250942.32388.jhb>