From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Apr 17 16:28:20 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA06756 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Fri, 17 Apr 1998 16:28:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from solaris.matti.ee (root@solaris.matti.ee [194.126.98.135]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA06448 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 1998 23:27:48 GMT (envelope-from vallo@matti.ee) Received: from localhost (vallo@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by solaris.matti.ee (8.8.8/8.8.8.s) with SMTP id CAA23380 for ; Sat, 18 Apr 1998 02:27:36 +0300 (EET DST) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 1998 02:27:34 +0300 (EET DST) From: Vallo Kallaste X-Sender: vallo@solaris To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: One more ccdconfig question In-Reply-To: <3537DD6D.73132BD7@tdx.co.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 17 Apr 1998, Karl Pielorz wrote: > Nope, I think at the end of the day - because of all the variables involved > you need _LUCK_ and lots of it :-) Oh, well.. > figures only made me 'feel' happy, I'm sure they wouldn't stand up in > court... Currently I'm testing with 1GB sized bonnie. Speed looks amazing from the any point of view :) But I see differences related to CPU overhead versus sustained data transfer. CPU overhead differences are about 25%, depends of the interleave factor. Sure, I can reach the neverending test loop for myself, uh-oh, sorry about my poor english. Vallo Kallaste vallo@matti.ee To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message