Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 10:33:12 +0930 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Brian Beattie <beattie@aracnet.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Greg Black <gjb-freebsd@gba.oz.au>, "C. Stephen Gunn" <csg@physics.purdue.edu> Subject: Re: Entombing for FreeBSD Message-ID: <XFMail.990419103312.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9904161333210.22567-100000@shell2.aracnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 16-Apr-99 Brian Beattie wrote: > I am philosophically opposed to this type of feature, I believe it > promotes slovenly work habits. On the other hand as a practical matter it > would probably save a lot of time, when dealing with non-professionals. Professionals don't make mistakes? wow. I don't know any then. ;) > I would also agree that libc hacking is a poor route. I think its more useful than kernel hacking.. (ie reading enviromental variables from the kernel would be difficult AFAIK) --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.990419103312.doconnor>