From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 23 02:31:34 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6116B16A4CE for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 02:31:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fusion.vilot.net (vilot.com [64.246.32.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF2E943D1D for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 02:31:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Received: from [192.168.1.234] (c-24-8-184-241.client.comcast.net [24.8.184.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by fusion.vilot.net (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j2N2VApa018356; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:31:11 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Message-ID: <4240D4EE.60004@vilot.com> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:31:10 -0700 From: Tom Vilot User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050124) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Risdon References: <20050322162216.GA1354@vilot.com> <1111509994.751.306.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <20050322170234.GA1576@vilot.com> <1111513253.751.314.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> In-Reply-To: <1111513253.751.314.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: PHP / Apache bus error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 02:31:34 -0000 Peter Risdon wrote: >>Can you explain why? What is it about 4.11 vs 4.9 with regard to this issue? >> >> > >Just that it's an up-to-date release. > >PHP and its extensions do depend on bits of the base system. You are >using the very latest ported version, so far as I can see, with an out >of date world. > Okay, I suspect I'm going to have to bite the bullet. I must admit, tho, I have some irrational fears about upgrading the core system. 1. I've never done it before 2. The server in question is in Texas. I am in Colorado. 3. I would rather not have to rent KVM and reboot into single user mode ... but will if I must ... (( sigh )) If I'm going to upgrade the system, does it make sense to just go straight to 5.3?