From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Jan 16 18:08:58 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA20063 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 18:08:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from itchy.serv.net (itchy.serv.net [205.153.153.233]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA20058 for ; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 18:08:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from zeno@itchy.serv.net) Received: from localhost (zeno@localhost) by itchy.serv.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA27384 for ; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 18:09:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 18:09:04 -0800 (PST) From: "Sean T. Lamont .lost." Reply-To: lamont@abstractsoft.com To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Since I have had two "what are you talking about" e-mails... Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I am forced to refine my question. What I want to do is force certain (rfc1918) dialup IP#'s to go towards an internal web page, one that is completely independent from anything on the internet at large. If I can duplicate the following functionality ifconfig lan0 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 alias ifconfig lan0 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.255 alias ... 4 billion lines later... ifconfig lan0 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 alias Then by using cisco policy routing, I can force the destination of EVERY IP number to be an internal web page. If they bring up www.cnn.com, they get this web page which has nothing to do with cnn.com. If they bring up www.mit.edu, they get this internal web page which has nothing to do with cnn.com. The only internet-relavant routing that needs to be done is that the DNS needs to work, so the routing on the LAN should work as normally. ...Just every other address should behave as if it's a local alias. The only other way I can think of to do this is a bind hack which returns an internal number for every query. This seems like it would be less elegant than my original question. For all intents and purposes, this is not a WAN routing question. Sean T. Lamont, CTO / Chief NetNerd, Abstract Software, Inc. (ServNet) Seattle - Bellingham - Vancouver - Portland - Everett - Tacoma - Bremerton email: lamont@abstractsoft.com WWW: http://www.serv.net "...There's no moral, it's just a lot of stuff that happens". - H. Simpson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message