From owner-freebsd-current Sun May 5 05:38:38 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id FAA14366 for current-outgoing; Sun, 5 May 1996 05:38:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sasami.jurai.net (root@sasami.jurai.net [205.218.122.51]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id FAA14349 Sun, 5 May 1996 05:38:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (winter@localhost) by sasami.jurai.net (8.7.4/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA26879; Sun, 5 May 1996 07:38:34 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 5 May 1996 07:38:34 -0500 (CDT) From: "Matthew N. Dodd" X-Sender: winter@sasami To: Joerg Wunsch cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: MBUFs leaking? In-Reply-To: <199605050925.LAA27588@uriah.heep.sax.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, 5 May 1996, J Wunsch wrote: > > options NMBCLUSTERS=4096 > It does the same. You might however have to quote the right-hand side > to protect it from config misinterpreting it. Humm... I've got 2 stable boxes... One very recent (2 days ago max) and the other about 3 weeks ago. On the older, I've got NMBCLUSTERS at 8192 as its a busy webserver and front end box. The other refuses to obey the options NMBCLUSTERS and only allocates about 180k to mbufs. I've played with maxusers, NMBCLUSTERS, and others and no effect. Kinda weird. This box goes into production in a week, so I hope to have figured it out by then. Any ideas? (yes, its quoted) Have a good one. | Matthew N. Dodd | winter@jurai.net | http://www.jurai.net/~winter | | Technical Manager | mdodd@intersurf.net | http://www.intersurf.net | | InterSurf Online | "Welcome to the net Sir, would you like a handbasket?"|