Date: 17 Oct 2004 22:04:59 +0200 From: Christian Laursen <xi@borderworlds.dk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The release of 5.3 Message-ID: <86zn2lkt5g.fsf@borg.borderworlds.dk> In-Reply-To: <1f3.10ada5c.2ea416b8@aol.com> References: <1f3.10ada5c.2ea416b8@aol.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
TM4525@aol.com writes: > I don't see how they can possible consider the "Release" of an O/S version > when perhaps the most widely-available NIC (em) doesn't work. [xi@borg ~]$ uname -a [22:03] FreeBSD borg.borderworlds.dk 5.3-RC1 FreeBSD 5.3-RC1 #29: Sun Oct 17 12:40:51 CEST 2004 root@borg.borderworlds.dk:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BORG i386 [xi@borg ~]$ dmesg | grep em0 [22:03] em0: <Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection, Version - 1.7.19> port 0xd400-0xd43f mem 0xdfea0000-0xdfebffff,0xdfec0000-0xdfedffff irq 10 at device 13.0 on pci2 em0: Speed:N/A Duplex:N/A em0: Link is up 100 Mbps Full Duplex em0: <Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection, Version - 1.7.35> port 0xd400-0xd43f mem 0xdfea0000-0xdfebffff,0xdfec0000-0xdfedffff irq 10 at device 13.0 on pci2 em0: Ethernet address: 00:10:dc:da:7f:5e em0: Speed:N/A Duplex:N/A em0: Link is up 100 Mbps Full Duplex It works pretty well for me. -- Christian Laursen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86zn2lkt5g.fsf>