Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 08:13:34 -0700 From: hiren panchasara <hiren.panchasara@gmail.com> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Adding options to RPI-B Message-ID: <CALCpEUHaV9DyHOmfC_CMVjKohSTz_aLKP72c0Cht5R=JzYYzMw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmoni3HTEsxXPh=7mrqJkZbX%2B6gPyAbaC7_P6F3m-E1H%2Bvg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CALCpEUEV2woA3qmQEGQCR0tZ%2B2fMX0xObw3b4F8_MDh51mODDw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmoni3HTEsxXPh=7mrqJkZbX%2B6gPyAbaC7_P6F3m-E1H%2Bvg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: > .. I'd rather we just make modules support work, and start shipping > stripped down kernels w/ modules. umm, I thought RPi can handle this much but I see your point. cheers, Hiren > > We have loader support for arm, right? :) > > > > -adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALCpEUHaV9DyHOmfC_CMVjKohSTz_aLKP72c0Cht5R=JzYYzMw>