From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 23 21:04:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7084F16A41F; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 21:04:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from csjp@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3995B43D46; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 21:04:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from csjp@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (csjp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j8NL42kn052330; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 21:04:02 GMT (envelope-from csjp@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from csjp@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j8NL423M052329; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 21:04:02 GMT (envelope-from csjp) Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 21:04:02 +0000 From: "Christian S.J. Peron" To: Xin LI Message-ID: <20050923210402.GA50245@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200509232049.j8NKnvIj024351@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200509232049.j8NKnvIj024351@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/ufs/ufs ufs_inode.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 21:04:02 -0000 On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 08:49:57PM +0000, Xin LI wrote: [..] > Log: > Restore a historical ufs_inactive behavior that has been changed > in rev. 1.40 of ufs_inode.c, which allows an inode being truncated > even when the filesystem itself is marked RDONLY. A subsequent > call of UFS_TRUNCATE (ffs_truncate) would panic the system as it > asserts that it can only be called when the filesystem is mounted > read-write (same changeset, rev. 1.74 of sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_inode.c). > Just to make sure that I am understanding you correctly here: You have restored a behaviour which can result in inode truncation, even on read only filesystems? Or you removed this behaviour? -- Christian S.J. Peron csjp@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Committer FreeBSD Security Team