Date: Wed, 12 Mar 1997 13:11:55 +0100 (MET) From: Christoph Kukulies <kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> To: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Cc: kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de, freebsd-ports@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: stcolor not in ghostscript4 Message-ID: <199703121211.NAA15631@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> In-Reply-To: <199703121152.DAA00943@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from Satoshi Asami at "Mar 12, 97 03:52:53 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> * Could the port maintainer > * > * MAINTAINER= andreas@klemm.gtn.com > * > * please correct this (perhaps) withing the 9 hour gracetime - which may > * have counted down by now :-) > > I don't know what you are talking about :), but anyway, Andreas, if > you want to make this change (and this change only), go ahead. It happened to mem that I typed ahead some <cr> <cr> so that I didn't get into the interactive configuration menu. Later I noticed that I had to respond/change settings in this menu. It would be nice if stcolor would be checked [X] by default so that it is built also when one skips (advertently or inadvertently) this interactive configuration. I believe a packages doesn't exist anyway for ghostscript 4 due to copyright restrictions so that one will be forced to build/configure ghostscript anyway from ports - or am I wrong? > > Satoshi > -- Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703121211.NAA15631>